ABSTRACT
Cardiovascular and reproductive health of women have been going hand in hand since the dawn of time, however, their links have been poorly studied and once the basis of their connections started to be established in late 20th century, it depended on local regional abilities and the level of progressive thinking to afford comprehensive women’s care beyond the “bikini medicine”. Further research identified different associations rendering more conditions sex-specific and launching therefore a slow, yet initial turn around in clinical trials’ concept as the majority of global cardiovascular guidelines rely on the results of research conducted on a very modest percentage of women and even less on the women of color. Currently, the concept of women’s heart centers varies depending on the local demographics’ guided needs, available logistics driven by budgeting and societal support of a broad-minded thinking environment, free of bias for everyone: from young adults questioning their gender identity, via women of reproductive age both struggling to conceive or keep working part time when healthy and line of work permits it during pregnancy, up to aging and the elderly. Using “Investigate-Educate-Advocate-Legislate” as the four pillars of advancing cardiovascular care of women, we aimed to sum-marize standing of women’s health in Serbia, present ongoing projects and propose actionable solutions for the future. © 2021, Serbia Medical Society. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The novel Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has spread across the globe generating a pandemic. Every affected country has tried its best to mitigate the virus's effects. Aim: This study was designed to implement the good clinical practice in the Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases Timisoara (ICDT) for Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) infection by a retrospective search for patients with a possible COVID-19 infection before widespread testing was available in our country. Materials and Methods: The retrospective study was conducted on selected group of 19 patients admitted to the ICDT, who displayed radiological signs of possible SARS-CoV-2 infection, between September 2019 and May 2020 in collaboration with the Radiology Department. Patients have been followed-up regarding their clinical status and asked to participate in Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody testing at a local laboratory. The patients were divided based on the period they were admitted to the hospital into four groups: September-December 2019, January-February 2020, March-April 2020 and May 2020. The patients tested for coronavirus came from all four timeframes. Results: Only 13 patients (male: female ratio was 10:3 ;mean age was 71.69 years) from the initial group were available and willing to answer a short interview and only five agreed to be tested for SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies. Most of the patients admitted to the hospital were suffering from acute myocardial infarction (30.7%), as well as heart failure (30.7%), followed by coronary heart disease (15.38%). A 30.7% of the patients had atrial fibrillation, 23% were also diagnosed with pneumonia during their hospital admission, 23% were also being treated for arterial hypertension, 7.69% had diabetes mellitus and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases (COPD). Out of the five patients tested for IgG antibodies, two tested positive, with a titre above 1.4. Conclusion: The patients who have gone through the SARS-CoV-2 infection without being previously diagnosed were identified and followed-up on their health status. By conceiving and performing this study, the authors have strived to establish a new set of rules to advance and improve good clinical practice in unprecedented times.